10 things You Don’t Know About Chris Eisgruber ‘83

By TEDDY SCHLEIFER

For the latest installment of the “Tangentially relevant things about the next Princeton President” series, here are 10 things you should know about the next leader of the University:

1. His middle name is Ludwig. That’s the ‘L.’ in the “Christopher L. Eisgruber” we’ve all been hearing about. He inherited the name, which three Bavarian kings — and Beethoven — went by, from his father, Ludwig M. Eisgruber.

eis1

King Ludwig II, unrelated (as far as we know.

2. His parents both worked at Oregon State University in Corvallis, OR. Ludwig M. taught agriculture and resource economics and chaired that department, publishing on endangered species and rural land use in the Pacific Northwest. His mother Eva also worked as a staff member at OSU. She died in 2003.

3. His mother fled the Nazi regime and Eisgruber eventually received monetary compensation for dispossessed assets. Eva was born in Berlin in 1932 and fled the Nazi regime that rose to power in her childhood. After moving to France, her family immigrated to St. Louis, Missouri. Chris Eisgruber and his three sisters were awarded about $170,000 in 2009 in a Holocaust claims resolution tribunal for assets dispossessed from Eva’s father, Salomon Kalisch.

4. Eisgruber captained the 1979 high school national champions in chess..

During his senior year of high school in Corvallis, Eisgruber was captain of the country’s national champion chess team. During a summer in his undergraduate years, he taught elementary school children the game.

5. He also edited his high school newspaper. But really, who didn’t?

6. He’s been a political creature since his 20’s – on all sides of the aisle. Eisgruber worked for John Anderson’s independent bid for the presidency in 1980, but became more of a partisan afterwards. After his sophomore year, he interned for Republican governor Victor Atiyeh. Since then, though, his politics have leaned decisively left: He donated $5,000 to Obama in the most recent election cycle, the second most of any Princeton faculty member.

7. At Princeton, Eisgruber defended the undergraduate curriculum from criticism. A year after ‘Prince’ chairman (and now Wilson School professor) Bart Gellman ’82 questioned the core curriculum in his farewell column, Eisgruber penned two responses in February of his senior year in its defense. He recommended five changes to the curriculum, including abandoning the pass/fail option for classes that fulfill distribution requirements and requiring every student to take two courses that focus on the great books.

eis2

Eisgruber in 1983.

8. He’s been in academia for nearly his entire life. Cue the attacks on east coast, Ivory Tower intellectualism. After Eisgruber’s four years at Princeton, he spent two at Oxford, three at UChicago, ten at NYU and now another thirteen at Princeton. In between his switch from a law school seat to a law school lectern, he clerked for some big dogs, including Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who he brought to campus two years ago.

9. He had a Twitter for about one day. Earlier this week I reported that Eisgruber had a Twitter. That’s no longer true. After the account was created on June 21 and sent out an inaugural introductory tweet, @ceisgruber was closed down and stripped of all its content, including the single tweet. A Princeton spokesman tells the ‘Prince’ that the account was created as a “placeholder” and that the account’s activity was because “someone made some assumptions upon the announcement.” It’s still got about 100 followers.

This account NEVER EXISTED.

This account NEVER EXISTED.

10. Eisgruber is in touch with college kids these days. He tells our friends at Princeton Alumni Weekly that he subscribes to Rolling Stone magazine and is a big folk-rock fan. “It also is occasionally a way to get perspective on college life,” he says.

Top 5 signals that the selection of Chris Eisgruber ’83 sends

By TEDDY SCHLEIFER
News Editor Emeritus

20130421_Eisgruber President_conordube_9119

The selection of Chris Eisgruber ’83 to replace retiring University president Shirley Tilghman is a decision with enormous implications for the future of the University. It also tells us a fair deal about what the search committee and the University as a whole values in the next decade. Here’s my top five thoughts:

Continue reading

An Impromptu On Tap With Chris Christie

By STEPHEN WOOD

20130421_BASE_Columbia_LiliaXie_1306

Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie spent a lot of time in the Orange Bubble this weekend, and not only because of the big news out of Nassau Hall. In addition to appearing at the press conference announcing Chris Eisgruber as the next president of the University, the governor stopped by Clarke Field on Saturday and Sunday to watch his son Andrew who is a member of the baseball team.

The black Suburbans were pretty inconspicuous and if there were bodyguards around him I didn’t see them, but I managed to find the governor in the crowd and, being an avid fan of baseball and a casual observer of politics, asked him for a few minutes of his time.

“He loves the team and he loves the school,” Christie said of Andrew, a freshman catcher. “So it’s been a great first year.”

20130421_BASE_Columbia_LiliaXie_1298

He said that he had been following Princeton’s season very closely and was able to diagnose (accurately, in my opinion) the Tigers’ biggest problem:

“It all comes down to defense for this team,” he said. “It’s about getting timely hits, but it really comes down to defense.”

The conversation took place just after the first inning of game three of the series, in which an error cost the Tigers a run, giving the Lions an early lead. Columbia went on to score nine more runs, winning 10-2 over Princeton, which committed three more errors.

20130421_BASE_Columbia_LiliaXie_1225

The action of the field may have been disappointing for Princeton fans, but Christie is used to being disappointed by baseball teams. When asked if he was a fan of baseball, the governor told me he is a die-hard Mets fan and not, this Orioles fan was relieved to learn, a fan of the Yankees.

“I got the orange, here and in the major leagues,” he said.

While Christie – who is, after all, a politician – was not nearly as critical of Yankees fans as I was, he did sum up the great thing about Mets fans, and fans of losing teams in general:

“When we win,” he said, “we get excited.”

Every win of the season has been exciting for Princeton fans, as the Tigers started out 2-16 and have had their ups and downs in the Ivy League. They will need some timely hitting and clean fielding this weekend against Cornell, who they play in doubleheaders Friday and Sunday. No word yet on whether Christie will be back at Clarke Field Friday.

Photos by Lilia Xie

Eisgruber ’83 named 20th president of Princeton

Provost Christopher Eisgruber ’83 has been named the next president of Princeton University, the U. announced at a press conference in Nassau Hall Sunday afternoon.

In attendance were New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, the Board of Trustees and members of the Presidential Search Committee.

20130421_Eisgruber President_monicachon_9412

Continue reading

Behind the Scenes at “Sunday in the Park with George”

By KAKI ELGIN
Sunday in the Park with George, a musical with music and lyrics by Stephen Sondheim and book by James Lapine, tells the story of artist Georges Seurat, a man who struggles to find a balance between his artwork and his personal life. Sondheim summarized the plot of the play: “Boy loves girl. Boy loves art. Boy loses girl. Boy gets both girl and art 100 years later.”
I had the opportunity to photograph the first act of Princeton’s production of the show, directed by Julia Bumke ’13 and starring Holly Linneman ’13 and Brad Wilson ’13, last week. I was given full stage access, meaning I could wander through the audience, into the wings, and behind the stage. As I photographed, I wanted not only to capture what the audience sees – what is on the stage – but also help those not involved in the production understand what goes on behind the scenes. Below, I bring you photographs that hopefully offer a glimpse:
Stage manager Christina Henricks '13, Bumke, and spotlight operator Laura Gates '14 share a laugh during a break in rehearsal. Sunday in the Park with George is a thesis project for Bumke, Linneman, and Wilson.

Stage manager Christina Henricks ’13, Bumke, and spotlight operator Laura Gates ’14 share a laugh during a break in rehearsal. Sunday in the Park with George is a thesis project for Bumke, Linneman, and Wilson.

The pit orchestra for the production sits behind the stage.

The pit orchestra for the production sits behind the stage.

 Cast members sit in the wings of the stage, waiting for their cues.

Cast members sit in the wings of the stage, waiting for their cues.

From the house an audience member would not be able to see in such great detail the smaller features of the play. Here, Olivia Nice '14 holds a fan.

From the house an audience member would not be able to see in such great detail the smaller features of the play. Here, Olivia Nice ’14 holds a fan.

Wilson's character, Georges, sketches aspects of the park.

Wilson’s character, Georges, sketches aspects of the park.

Tadesh Inagaki '14, as a boatman, smokes a pipe while posing for Georges.

Tadesh Inagaki ’14, as a boatman, smokes a pipe while posing for Georges.

Adam Stasiw '13 and Julia Phillips '15 play Jules, an artist, and his wife.

Adam Stasiw ’13 and Julia Phillips ’15 play Jules, an artist, and his wife.

Dot, played by Linneman, dances as she prepares for a date with Georges. However, Georges in the end chooses to work on his painting rather than join her for a night at the Follies.

Dot, played by Linneman, dances as she prepares for a date with Georges. However, Georges in the end chooses to work on his painting rather than join her for a night at the Follies.

To close the act, Georges arranges the actors so they mimic his painting, Georges Seurat's famous A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte.

To close the act, Georges arranges the actors so they mimic his painting, Georges Seurat’s famous A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte.

From the wings - where the actors wait to go on stage - we view Georges alone.

From the wings – where the actors wait to go on stage – we view Georges alone.

You can see the Prince‘s review of the show here.

Refresher Course on Tournament Rules for Dodgeball

By JOHN WOLFE

It’s been a year since you’ve played in the Dodgeball Tournament and keeping track of all the intricate details in that Colosseum Club rulebook can get a little messy. To help you sort out your disputes before tempers spiral out of control, we’ve looked up the Official Rules and posted them here:

 1. You must be hit three times to become out.

 2. Foot is part of the ground- getting hit there does NOT count as one of your three outs.

 3. If someone catches your ball and you point at a wall, ceiling or basketball hoop, the ball retroactively becomes dead prior to the catch, making you not out.

 4. If you are hit in the head, you are not out- headshots do NOT count.

 5. Each team is only allowed to play with ten more players than the opposing team’s legal maximum.

 6. If you hit someone in the head, he is out – headshots have always counted and always will.

 7. Holding a ball up above your head and pointing at someone is the same thing as catching a ball. Whoever you point at thus becomes out.

8. Once a player becomes out, he must stand next to the referees out of play. He cannot return to the game UNLESS: A) His teammate catches a ball thrown by an opponent, or B) He leaves for a while until everyone forgets about him and then walks back in on the other side.

9. The rules about what happens when a player holding a ball gets hit, deflects the ball, drops their own ball, etc. are tricky- they’re whatever you want them to be in each new situation, regardless of what they were five minutes ago. Verbal dibs are to be respected.

10. In the Huge Teams’ division, no player may enter the game after it begins unless he is somehow able to climb over or around the three-foot fence placed along most of the baseline.

11. In the Huge Teams’ division, there are no outs.

12. Each round will be single-elimination. In order to advance to the final round, a team must EITHER A) win its semi-final game or B) lose its semi-final game, then join the semi-final winner from the other side of the bracket to ensure the team that just beat them cannot win the championship.

13. During the semi-final and final rounds, the referees will privately predetermine some fixed amount of time. After that time has expired, they will send the game into overtime. Once overtime begins, the referees will begin watching the game and calling people out.

14. Regarding individual rule disputes in which the referee is unsure or simply doesn’t care- tie goes to whoever is louder.

Bracketology: The 2013 Dodgeball Tournament

BY KEVIN WHITAKER
Sports Editor Emeritus

Ninety-four teams will enter the 2013 Dodgeball Tournament on Thursday night, and 93 will leave as losers. Can football regain the magic it rode to championships in 2007 and 2011? Will there be a surprise like Hawaii Club in 2010? If you’re stuck while filling out your bracket, the ‘Prince’ is here to help. Here are 10 things to watch tonight:

Players line up in the 2012 Dodgeball Tournament. Photo by Conor Dube.

Players line up in the 2012 Dodgeball Tournament. Photo by Conor Dube.

Continue reading

Columnist Conversations: Does the Honor Code Need Revision?

By THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN OPINION STAFF

Recently, the Editorial Board suggested that the punishment for taking extra time on exams is too severe and that the punishment should be reduced to a zero on the exam and academic probation. Are there other aspects of the Honor Code that could use revision?

Kinnari: The biggest problem seems to be that we don’t know the Honor Code well enough. Perhaps I’m just speaking for myself, but I couldn’t tell you what the punishments for specific offenses are at all. I think most of us sign the pledge and do our work. So, realistically, I couldn’t tell you which aspects of the Honor Code need revision. It works in the sense that it is a deterrent to cheating. But if you were to ask me if the punishment seems to fit the crime under the new revisions, I would have to tell you that I didn’t even know new revisions were made. The Honor Code seems to work more as a looming blanket punishment.

Chelsea: I agree. Obviously, we are all expected to read the Rights, Rules, and Regulations to understand the Honor Code and I could tell you generally what constitutes cheating but I definitely don’t remember the specific details as to what gets the most severe punishment. I will say though that a year-long suspension for going a few seconds over time seems a bit much. In all honesty, you could be putting your name at the top of the page or writing out the Honor Code. I think there needs to be some sort of statement from the professor like, “You have two minutes to write any technical things and then you must put down your pens” rather than a simple, “Pens down.” And perhaps that happens more often than I think but I do believe it should be a uniform practice.

Kinnari: It would make sense to have everyone fill out the Honor Code before the exam begins, to make sure that everyone has the exam and that they write the simple line. That way you can do a definitive, “Pens down.” at the end. If you come in late, you can simply write the Honor Code in front of a TA or professor at the end of the exam. These are obvious policy fixes to exam-giving that would clear up any “possible confusion.” But I would also agree that a year long suspension for going a few seconds over time seems to be a bit much. The real problem is when students take minutes, as everyone else is handing in their exam, and continue to work. But again, we can’t even give students a few extra seconds because we wouldn’t know where to draw the line of cheating.

Becky: Though I do think it makes sense to lessen the punishment for writing over on an exam, my pragmatic side has to admit that I don’t think much will change if the Honor Committee revises this policy. Like you said Kinnari, many students aren’t familiar with the punishment as it currently stands, so they- and myself included before I read the Editorial- do not know that writing over time is a one-year suspension. I suspect that the revision (if it happens) will get momentary press and be quickly forgotten. Students will continue to squeak out a few extra seconds on exams. Do you guys think that teachers should be more strict about the time limit?

Kinnari: There is another major problem with the way the Honor Code works. It’s not enforced by the professors/TA’s themselves. And we as students are told that we are expected to turn in someone who we see taking extra time. Realistically, none of us are going to do this. Or at least most of us won’t, even if the punishment now seems to fit the crime. This should be the proctor’s responsibility to both know the punishments and enforce them. And, like Becky said, despite these changes we are still going to see students taking a few extra seconds here and there. This puts the person who has to enforce the Honor Code in a difficult position. Are they going to punish several more students than they otherwise would have for taking a few extra seconds? If you want students to really follow these rules, you need a better way to show them that this is going to be taken very seriously. But how can you show them that without, at least in the beginning, ending up with several students on academic probation?

Becky: This is where the Honor Code gets tricky. Because the point of the Honor Code is that students will police ourselves, but often at the end of the exam – when the proctor comes back in – the policing ends. We hand over responsibility to the proctor to enforce the ending time.

Chelsea: The Honor Code is predicated on the fact that students will do the right thing. And technically, the right thing includes handing the exam in on time. Unfortunately, I think students tend to have a looser definition of how “wrong” a few extra seconds is. The gray area is the problem. However, I would hate to suggest that we can’t bear the responsibility of taking exams without a proctor. The policy is something Princeton prides itself on.

Kinnari: True, but have you ever been in an exam where the professor or TA wasn’t there for the last minute to tell you that time was up? I haven’t. I’m alright with giving up that last minute and having someone in the room to enforce the rule rather than being told that I have to do it. But, again, I can’t see how a professor or TA would really be more comfortable reporting a student than I would for this offense.

Becky: I definitely am not advocating that proctors sit in for the whole exam. But I do think that proctors need to take more responsibility at the end of the exam. For example, in my Econ class it is made very clear that writing over on the exam will cost students points. A big deal was made of the policy in class which reminded people that (at least in this class) writing over on the exam would cost a certain amount of points per minute. I think teachers have the efficacy to decide how to punish writing over on an exam as long as it is consistent for all students taking their exam and the policy is explicit at the start.

Kinnari: Again, you fall into the problem of the gray area. How were students penalized? What separates being penalized for five minutes versus ten seconds? I agree that that would be a better solution, but the implementation of it is tricky and you run into the same sorts of problems. I’ve seen exams where you could take a deduction for an extra fifteen minutes or so, but is that where the problem lies?

Becky: If the teacher decides that 15 minutes is the absolute cutoff, lays out the policy clearly at the start, and enforces it strictly for all students I don’t see a problem with that. The problem isn’t that there is inconsistency between classes but within classes.

 

Photos of the Week: Spring Arrives on Campus

By THE DAILY PRINCETONIAN PHOTO DEPARTMENT

As the weather warmed up over the weekend, Princeton’s campus began to feel more and more like spring had truly arrived. The Daily Princetonian’s photographers were out capturing the season’s bright colors, sunshine and activity.

Photos by Merrill Fabry and Sean Pen

IMG_8331 (2) IMG_8332 IMG_8339 IMG_8366 (1)DP2_0004